Volume 17, Issue 2 (Spring 2026)                   Caspian J Intern Med 2026, 17(2): 10-0 | Back to browse issues page

Ethics code: No. IR.UMSU.HIMAM.REC.1402.043

XML Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mohammadi E, Hooshmand Gharebagh L, Hajiesmaello M. Intervention Strategies for Severe Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes: A Clinical Trial Comparing Basal Insulin and Modified-Release Gliclazide. Caspian J Intern Med 2026; 17 (2) :10-0
URL: http://caspjim.com/article-1-4740-en.html
Department of Internal Medicine, Medicine Faculty, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran , dremohammadi90@gmail.com
Abstract:   (69 Views)

Background: The global rise of type 2 diabetes (T2D) presents significant healthcare challenges in diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. This study compares basal insulin and modified-release gliclazide to assess their effectiveness in managing glycemic control and other clinical factors in T2D patients.

Methods: This open-label, randomized controlled trial included 90 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) exhibiting poorly controlled glycemic levels (HbA1c > 10%), referred to endocrinology clinic of Imam Khomeini Hospital, Urmia, Iran, between 2023 and 2024. The patients were randomly assigned into one of two intervention groups: the Gliclazide-MR group (n=45), receiving 30 mg of modified-release gliclazide twice daily, or the Basal Insulin group (n=45), receiving basal insulin (detemir or glargine) at a dosage of 0.1–0.3 units per kilogram of body weight.

Results: The mean age of participants was 56.4 ± 11.48 years in the gliclazide-MR group and 55.5 ± 13.48 years in the basal insulin group. Baseline demographic characteristics and pre-intervention variables demonstrated no statistically significant differences between the groups (p > 0.05). Both intervention groups exhibited statistically significant reductions in three glycemic indices—HbA1c, fasting blood glucose (FBS), and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose (BS2hpp)—at the 3-month follow-up compared to baseline (p < 0.001). The gliclazide-MR group demonstrated comparable efficacy to the basal insulin group in reducing these glycemic indices.

Conclusion: Both basal insulin and modified-release gliclazide demonstrated efficacy in improving glycemic control in patients with severe hyperglycemia. The optimal treatment choice should be individualized based on patient-specific factors and treatment goals.

     
Policy Brief: Original Article | Subject: Internal
Received: 2025/04/12 | Accepted: 2025/07/19 | Published: 2026/03/15

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb